The Story of Indian Money

The Story of Indian Money Part II

The Harappan era (Mature phase ~ 3500 B.C. – 1900 B.C.)

The Origins of Money are vitally linked to three important factors; one, the beginning of cities, and the second, trade including within the city and outside its environs.

The third and the most important factor was the beginning of Man’s ability to count objects and thus maintain accounts. The earliest form of writing is not historical or poetic or literary material but accounts of traders!

This is true of all ancient civilizations like the Sumerian, Indus (Harappan) or the Chinese where writing symbols were invented initially to maintain accounts of trade.

The next phase in the Indian sub-continent’s development was the beginning of the Harappan civilisation around 3500 B.C in the North-Western and Western region of the Indian sub-continent popularly dubbed as India’s first urbanisation era by modern historians.

The Harappan civilisation was indeed India’s first tryst with urban culture and international trade. The Harappan people traded with the Mesopotamian people extensively as evidenced by exchange of pottery, seals and other objects through middlemen from Dilmun (modern Bahrain).

The Harappans evolved newer scientific advances like metallurgical objects, exact weighing system, innovative ship-building techniques, cities with advanced municipal sewage systems and multi-storeyed brick houses; however, not much has been discovered about their exact medium of exchange for their ‘international’ transactions.

The theory that Harappan seals were currency has been discounted by eminent scholars. Alternatively, it has been suggested that the presence of huge ‘granaries’ (probably owned by the state) may have been the ‘storehouses of value and wealth’ in the Harappan economy. Like many other aspects of the Harappan civilisation, Harappan currency remains one of the greatest enigmas that defy logic and solution.

However, the presence of some form of currency is most plausible thanks to the presence of exact weights. The Harappan weights were found in Bahrain in modern excavations in recent times suggesting that the weights were uniform in the two regions and used to quantify the buying and selling of trade goods between the two people.

Another pointer to a Harappan currency is the Harappan familiarity with the use of gold for ornamentation. Thus, Harappan currency may have been bullion most probably gold as gold objects are common in Harappan sites as opposed to silver.

Thus, Harappan era represents a monetary puzzle in the history of Indian money due to lack of definite evidence of a Harappan currency. However, other evidences like organized weight system, familiarity with gold as a precious commodity and a sophisticated system of trading point to the existence of a definite form of exchange system in the period.

(To be continued)

The Story of Indian Money

The Story of Indian Money – Part I

The recent excitement about the new symbol for the Indian Rupee created a huge tsunami of excitement in the Indian media as it symbolized India’s rise in the hierarchy of the select group of nations with similar privileges.

However, the event also brought the focus on the antiquity of Indian money and most newspapers scrambled for more information on this neglected topic in Indian History.

Hurried research by columnists made us faintly aware of the creation of the Indian denomination ‘Rupaiya’ or the modern Rupee during Sher Shah Suri’s reign clearly overlooking that the word ‘Rupaiya’ came from a more ancient Sanskrit term ‘Rupa’ meaning an image impressed on a metal.In India, like everywhere else, the idea of ‘money’ did not evolve overnight and had to undergo a parallel evolution with humans’ growth from pre-historic barbarians to the comfort-seeking creatures of today.

India has the longest and unbroken tradition of monetary evolution stretching three millennia or more and its money underwent dynamic changes with the rise and fall of numerous kingdoms and dynasties in the Indian sub-continent. Hence, the study of Indian money is essentially a kaleidoscopic study of the Indian civilisation itself in its varied hues.

The Pre-historic era (2.6 million years ago - 5000 B.C.)

The Indian sub-continent has seen continuous human occupation right from the beginning of of Stone Age’s hunter-gatherer stage (2.6 million years ago) into a settled human existence supported by farming and animal domestication during the Neolithic period (~ 8000 B.C.) Running parallel to this evolution has been the growth of human capability of trading beginning in the Palaeolithic Era (2.6 million years- 12000 B.C.) with simple barter of edible goods against stone tools and weapons. Indian archaeologists have found evidences of such exchanges in the form of ‘factory sites’ of tools which suggest mass production of stone tools for bartering.

The succeeding periods of prehistoric era viz. Mesolithic Era (12000 B.C. – 8000 B.C.) and Neolithic Era (8000 B.C. – 5000 B.C.) saw more sophistication in barter system with the evolution of primitive money in the form of ‘money objects’.

This is suggested by hoards of ‘money objects’ like arrow heads, iron filings, bead money, copper implements and cowry shells (in lands far away from the sea) found all over India’s numerous pre-historic sites. Archaeologists have inferred that these objects were used to ‘buy’ other valuable objects since they were perceived as ‘valuable’ by the primitive people. Thus, the pre-historic period helped train humans in the essential art of mutual exchange. However, the period was interspersed with sporadic violence over the ‘perceived inequities’ fostered by this primitive trading.

The major drawback of barter, though it survived for a long long time, was the excessive reliance on a mutual need for exchange between the concerned individuals; a condition that made trading a probable cause for strife in pre-historic society.

Barter objects are found often in archaeological excavations spanning all periods especially the prehistoric era. One famous example is the Copper Hoards found in Central India where Copper tools of various types are found huddled in form of a typical factory site. The British Museum's Coin Gallery exhibits a typical Copper hoard found from Ghungeria, Madhya Pradesh as an example of this prehistoric culture.

Thus, the idea of money in this primitive period thus centred upon exchange of metallic objects either in form of domestic or mechanical tools or weapons for self defence in exchange for other goods.

(To be continued)

Britain's numismatic panaroma and dilemma

I have spent the last week sorting out modern British coinage in the cosmopolitan city of London and couldn't help making some wry observations.

I discovered that apart from the decimal system of the Brish Pound coin, 1p, 2p, 10p 20p 50p and so on, the coinage of United Kingdom features a myriad of symbolic representations of the federal regions of England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales.

Despite a national competition for designing a new coinage in 2008 with a new concept of using the British Shield in bits and parts, its pre-2008 coins merrily circulate till this day carrying symbols of the Celtic Cross representing Northern Ireland (see picture on left), the Welsh Dragon representing Wales, the Rampant Lion symbol of Scotland, and the Three Passant Lions (three lions appearing together which also appears on the British Shield) representing England. There exists a set of floral representations of these regions which I shall illustrate later.

The old 50 Pence coins feature Brittania the physical manifestation of Britain much akin to India's Bharat Mata.

However, the obverse is much staid and traditional with a bust of Queen Elizabeth II with her regnal titles in Latin as Defender of the faith with the year of issue.

Moreover, the switchover to the new coins hasn't been smooth as the British Shield doesn't have any representation of Wales; also the new coins are a post-modern artistic representation whose significance is not observed by the majority.

My take is that if coinage is drastically changed, its symbolic representation has to be made with more popular designs than modern artistic standards which is not appreciated by the common man. New coins pose problems everywhere but their acceptance is gradual and an over the time affair. Strangely, I have not come across any new coins here and many Indian colleagues I spoke to think these old coins are the only ones that exist in U.K.!

The British establishment battling recession can do little to assuage these numismatic grouses especially since redesigning the coins will drain its coffers unnecessarily. Hence, I believe it has taken no cognizance of this issue. The 2 pound coins are less controversial featuring Darwin and an ape to represent the 200th anniversary of the great man in 2009.

If we were to apply the British style of symbolic representation to Indian states, there would be absolute chaos. Imagine having twenty eight types of coins with as many symbols on the reverse of the Indian rupee. India's numismatic problems have been lessened by simple adoption of the Ashoka Chakra which is a fairly ancient symbol to arouse any modern sectarian grouses.

East African 5 Cent Coin: Relic of India's Kenyan Connexion

For the Gen X, geopolitical entities like East Africa cut no ice, but it was a vital region of economic activity in the nineteenth and twentieth century with the major European powers vying for their share in the precious pie. East Africa comprising of a large tract of land with vital deposits of mineral ore, tea and coffee plantations. The Portuguese were one of the first colonial powers setting up their base in Mozambique in the fifteenth century, while the French set up their trading station at Madagascar; the Germans had their interests in Zanzibar while the British turned to the region only in the late nineteenth century with the forming of East African Protectorate in 1880s roughly comprising of present day Kenya.
By the end of the nineteenth century, Indian immigrants chiefly from Gujarat swarmed the region as indentured labourers initially, battling discriminatory measures like segregation in ghettos, commercial restrictions to pursue a variety of professions like money lending, trading and artistic/manual professions in the protectorate’s cities and towns. Eventually, they outnumbered Europeans by two to one in 1919.

Delving into my collections, I came across a Five Cent coin from East Africa issued in 1941, in the middle of the Second World War when British were busy fighting the Axis Powers to defend their turfs in Asia and Africa desperately. The coin’s obverse has ‘East Africa’ inscribed with the denomination in a staid manner but the reverse has the imperial designations of George V in Latin as ‘GEORGIVS V REX ET IND: IMP:’ meaning ‘George V King and Emperor India’.
Thus, the coin is of dual importance to India, one as its historical context speaks of a lost homeland for many expatriate Indians whose forefathers had to leave East Africa (Kenya) in the 1960s in the wake of blatant racial discrimination practised by the ruling Kenyan government and the coin's statement of George V as Emperor of India. The coin is a vital material evidence of a lost era of colonial domination which was soon challenged all over the globe; escalated by the post-world war confusion faced by the European authorities back home. Thus, these colonial coins are a vital part of our heritage and important tools in recreation of lost historical and geopolitical entities which no longer exist for the younger generations.

A Greek Tragedy of an extinct Drachma Coin reminiscing ancient Hellenic glory with Aristotle’s image

Greece has been the centre of a ancient Hellenic civilization which spread all over the known world in wake of the rise of Alexander of Macedonia in the fourth century B.C.; spreading it right from Greece to Persia, Egypt, Central Asia right till the North-West frontier of the Indian subcontinent as a direct result of Alexander's expansionist campaign.

There was significant change in the world of Numismatics in the wake of Alexander’s campaign when many states began adopting the Greek Attic standard of drachms (one drachm approx. 4.37 gm) under the aegis of the Seleucid Empire which rose after Alexander's death across these territories.

India too adopted the drachm as a unit of its numismatic weight system first under the Kushans (1st Century to 3rd Century A.D.) who replaced the Indo-Greek rulers of the North-Western India and then under the Imperial Gupta dynasty in the 4th Century A.D.
The drachma survived as a name of a unit of coin weight in most Indian languages till the early medieval period as ‘dramma’ which was eventually corrupted to ‘daam’ during Akbar’s reign (r.1556-1605) till it became the term for the price of an item in later day Hindi.
Thus, the Greek drachma played a seminal role in the evolution of coins of the world in its initial gestational period.

Cut to the twenty-first century, Greece is a modern state with a flourishing economy benefitting from its shipping industry, tourism, exports, etc. However, the Greek economy has seen its economy floundering under the worst ever crisis in 2009-10 causing it to lean on more prosperous and stable members of the European Union and earning their ire. Worse still, today Greece doesn’t even have its own independent currency, the Euro having replaced the indigenous drachma in 2001. This sad state of affairs is similar to Alexander's expansionism albeit the expansion is under the European Union engulfing the first super state of European civilisation, Greece.

I came across a 5 Drachma coin in my collection having inscriptions in Greek alphabet on its obverse (image on left) written from 7’0 Clock position as
‘ΕΛΛHNIKH ΔHMOKPATIA’ read as ELLENIKE DEMOKRATIA in Roman alphabet meaning ‘Hellenic Republic’ Greece’s official name today.
The centre has its denomination written as ‘5 DPAXMAI’ read as ‘5 DRACHMAI’ in Roman alphabet or plainly 5 Drachma. The date of the coin is given as 1976.

The reverse (image on right) has the image of Greek polymath, Aristotle who amongst his many other interests was also a student of another great Greek philosopher, Plato and a teacher to Alexander of Macedon. The Greek legend on the coin is spelt as
‘APIΣTOTEΛHΣ’ transliterated as ‘ARISTOTELES’ in Roman alphabet or plain ‘ARISTOTLES’

The Drachma was revived with the establishment of the modern state of Greece in 1832 and was issued in three different phases between the two world wars. The third phase coincided with Greece’s domestic crisis in the form of the rule of a military junta between 1967 and 1974.

In 1976, after the fall of the military junta and the installation of a new parliament of the Hellenic Republic, a new series of eight denomination coins carrying images of ancient heroes of the Greek nation was issued and this tiny cupro-nickel coin was a part of that historic series. Hence, this coin today represents a crisis in the world of coins where larger economic interests are subsuming indigenous coinage at a very large cost of loss of national and cultural identities.

A Pan-Asian currency, anyone?

Morocco’s M.A.D. Dirham issued in 1974 by King Hassan II

Morocco is a land with a unique history with episodes of clashes between the Western and Arabic civilisations due to its strategic location at the farthest tip of North Africa bordering with Spain and other Mediterranean countries. In the medieval period, Morocco was a part of a geo-political entity known to the Arabs as ‘Maghreb’ literally the 'Land of the setting Sun' or the Western Land including other North African countries like Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Mauritania and parts of the Western Sahara desert. Medieval geographers referred to Morocco as 'Al-Maghrib al Aqşá' 'The Farthest West', to distinguish it from it immediate neighbours in the West.

In modern times, the Moroccan government invoked this historical identity by adopting the official name ‘al-Mamlaka al Maghrebiyya’ on all its communications including its coinage.
Morocco has been ruled by the Alaouite dynasty which has ruled its territories since 1666; however, the Alaouite ruler, Sultan Abdel Hafid was forced to give up Morocco's sovereignty in 1912 turning it into a French protectorate under the Treaty of Fez.

The next rulers ruled nominally under French tutelage till Morocco regained her independence in 1956 and became a constitutional monarchy under the leadership of King Mohammad V. He was succeeded by his son, Prince Mulay Hassan who took over as King Hassan II in 1961 and ruled till his death in 1999.
I came across a coin with the legend ‘al-Mamlakatahu al-Maghrebiyya’ with the bust of a leader identified as Hassan II by the legend ‘Hassan al-Thani*' on the obverse. The coin is distinguished by a true-to-life portrait of Hassan II with a grim expression.
The reverse features Morocco's coat-of-arms with the image of two lions upholding a crown and a shield with a star against the setting sun with the crest of the symbol enshrining a Quranic verse ‘An Tansar wa Allah Yansar Kam’ meaning ‘You defend Allah and Allah will defend you’**. The reverse states the denomination as ‘Wahid Dirham’ with the Roman numeral ‘1’ denoting its value as 1 Dirham; the Moroccan dirham’s international acronym lends it a strange connotation, M.A.D. The reverse of this coin has two dates in Roman numerals flanking the coat-of-arms; its date in the Common Era, 1974 and its date in Hijri era, 1394.
Thus, this coin represents Morocco’s unique attempt to straddle between its modern and medieval identity as Morocco’s twin port cities of Casablanca and Tangier which attract hordes of Western tourists to its exotic beaches each summer, contribute to its bustling tourist economy in a major way.

*Thani means Second in Arabic

**This verse is seen on the actual coat-of-arms but is unclear on the coin’s image

Egypt and Syria’s Pan-Arabic coin under the auspices of the United Arabic Republic in 1960

The period of 1950-60s saw political movements all around the Arabic world spanning 25 countries contained in the West Asia and North African regions to unite against the rising power of Zionist Israel under the banner of Pan-Arabism. The proponents of Pan-Arabism, alternatively called Arabic nationalism, viewed the world as divided into two parts, Arabic and non-Arabic and aimed to unite it all Arabic countries under a utopian welfare state with socialism as their main ideology.
The most practical political achievement of this movement was the formation of political federations which were united against common enemies and interests. One such union was between Egypt and Syria under the auspices of the United Arabic Republic which began in 1958 under the leadership of the dynamic Egyptian leader, President Gamal Abdel Nasser and ended prematurely with the exit of Syria in 1961.
I came across a coin with the Arabic legend ‘al-Jamhooriyat al-Arabiya Mutahidah’ on its obverse (see left image) in the upper line which is translated as ‘United Arabic Republic’ making it amply clear that the coin was a joint issue of Egypt and Syria under U.A.R.

The central legend ascribes the denomination ’10 Qirush’ which was a sub-unit of the Eqyptian pound as 1 Egyptian Pound was equal to 100 Qirush.
This Qirush is similar to the Ghirsh of the Saudi Arabian Riyal which we have discussed in the post of Saudi Arabia and is a remnant of the earlier Ottoman currency unit, Kuruş which in turn came from the Italian/Venetian silver Grossi, a coin which was the trade currency of the Middle East prior to the Venetian gold ducat or sequins in the early medieval era.
An interesting feature of this coin is inclusion of the term ‘Suriyya’, the Arabic name of Syria, after the ‘10 Qirush’ indicating that this coin was probably issued for exclusive circulation in Syria only.
The geopolitics of the U.A.R. doesn’t interests us here; however, it is interesting to know that the adoption of a common currency would have bound the two states for a longer period; however such a provincial approach to currency points to the fact that the leaders of the two countries were well aware of the temporary nature of the union.
The reverse of the coin shows the coat-of-arms which displays an eagle known as ‘the Eagle of Saladin*’ bearing a shield against its chest with two stars; perched on the legend, ‘al-Jamhooriya al-Arabiyya Muttahidah’ (partially erased on this coin) and the year in common era 1960 on the left and in the Hijri era 1380 on the right in Arabic numerals.

The 10 Qirush coin is a small denomination and was probably exchanged as small change in the Syrian territory for tea or small snack in 1960s. Today, we see that the Syrian Arabic Republic has adopted a variant of the emblem** as its coat-of-arms with a Syrian Hawk known as ‘Hawk of Qureish’ with the two stars intact albeit with two notable differences, the hawk’s head is turned to the right as opposed to left on our coin and the name of the republic has been changed to ‘al-Jamhooriyat al-Arabiyya Suriyya’ pointing to the evolution begun by this coin during its heyday in the markets of Damascus.

* the legendary medieval ruler of Egypt and Syria
**The evolution of this emblem can be seen on the link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coat_of_arms_of_Syria

Iraqi 10 Fils Coin from the Hasshemite dynasty period issued by Ghazi I

I wish to present another Iraqi coin with the side profile of a ruler as a special feature in direct contrast to the Republican coin of the previous post. My hunch was that it was a ruler from the Hasshemite dynasty who ruled Iraq for four decades between and after the two World Wars.
My hunch proved to be correct as the legend flanking the right side of the king’s profile on the obverse side read ‘Ghazi al-Awwal’ i.e. ‘Ghazi the First' proving that this coin was issued in the reign of King Ghazi I who ruled Iraq in the crucial period preceding the World War II.

Ghazi I was the only son of King Faisal I who was the first Hasshemite ruler hailing from the clan of hereditary Sharifs of Mecca. Ghazi assumed regal authority in 1933 on the death of Faisal I and ruled Iraq till his untimely death in 1939 at the young age of 27 in a mysterious car crash; rumoured to be engineered by his all powerful Prime Minister, Nuri al-Said.
Coming back to the coin in question, its reverse side has legends neatly divided into five segments; the central circle ascribes the denomination of 10 fils to the coin; the two side legends flanking the circle state the date, the left one 1938 in the common era and the right one, 1357 in Hijri era albeit in Arabic numerals; the upper and lower legends restate ‘al Mulkah al Iraqiyah’.
The coin is a nickel one and was minted at the Royal Mint, London reflecting the close relations between the Hasshemite regime and the British even after their exit.

Iraq did not submerge into anarchy after Ghazi's death because his 3 year old son, Faisal II was installed with Ghazi's cousin, Abd’allah serving as the Regent. Faisal II took over the throne after coming of age in 1953. However, he was killed in cold blood along with other members of the royal family after the coup d’état by General Abd’al Karim Qassim hailed as the ‘14th July Revolution’ ended the four decade long Hasshemite rule over Iraq.
10 Fils is a very small denomination as the Iraqi currency in Ghazi’ s regime had the following sub-units;
1 Dinar = 5 Riyals = 20 Dirham = 1000 Fils
However, a small coin like the above, despite its low value, has again proved to be an invaluable tool for retracing the path of History in its own inimitable way.

Iraqi Coin from Pre-Saddam Revolutionary Regime of Abdul Karim Qassim (1958-1963)

A coin in my collection has a unique symbol of a starry Sun with a pair of swords on the inner circle with a sheaf of wheat at the centre (Left Image). Another interesting feature is a finely etched date read as ‘14 Tammuz 1958’ in the lower line making it very intriguing. The obverse inscription ‘al-Jamhooriyat al-Iraq’ (in the upper line) meaning ‘Republic of Iraq’ makes it amply clear that it is an Iraqi coin; other features on the obverse include the denomination ‘10 Falus’ and two dates ‘1959 and ‘1379’ in Arabic numerals.

However, I soon reasoned that the former is the date of the coin in Christian era i.e. 1959 A.D. and the latter its Hijri era equivalent i.e. 1379 A.H.
However, a search for Iraq’s connection with 1958 produced more interesting results; Iraq had a Revolution on 14 July 1958 which deposed its ruling monarchy of Hasshemite dynasty through an armed coup executed by a group of army officers with numerous grievances against the decadent regime.
In modern consciousness, Iraq and its History has come to be conveniently divided into two neat blocks; Iraq under Saddam Hussein and the post-Saddam Hussein American occupation era; clearly overlooking the fact that the country has an ancient past stretching right from the Sumerian civilisation c. 4000 B.C. (which invented the world’s first writing system) till the medieval Islamic period of Abbasid Caliphate who established Baghdad as their capital city in A.D. 761. However, this golden period of Islamic culture came to an end when the Mongol warlord, Hulagu (Halaku) Khan massacred the last Abbasid Caliph, al-Musta’sim in A.D. 1257 and ended the Abbasid Caliphate in Iraq.
Iraq was then subjected to a host of foreign invasions from the Mongols to Ottomans in fourteenth century who ruled it directly or by proxy till Iraq’s first invasion by a Western power, the British after the Ottomans lost to British in World War I; leading to Iraq’s inferior status as a British protectorate for over a decade and half.

The British left Iraq in 1932 under the care of a monarchy headed by King Faisal I who founded the Hasshemite dynasty which ruled Iraq till July 14 1958 when a group of army officers overthrew King Faisal II under the leadership of Brigadier General Abd’al Karim Qassim.

The coup was later celebrated by Qassim’s regime as ‘July 14 Revolution’. Qassim took over as the Prime Minister of Iraq and initiated a host of reforms in various fields like agriculture, women's rights and education; he ruled till his downfall and death after a coup by the Ba’ath Party in 1963.
The ‘Sun with two sabre and sheaf of wheat’ emblem was adopted by Qassim’s regime as Iraq’s State emblem carefully avoided any Pan-Arabic or religious symbol and represents the regime’s reformist agenda as reflected by the sheaf of wheat.

This coin thus in all probability symbolises a free and progressive Iraq which died a premature death at the hands of the Ba’ath Party supremacists who soon began to suppress all discontent like any dictatorial regime. It is anybody's guess if Iraq would have been a better place had the Qassim regime been allowed to pursue its progressive agenda peacefully!

Image of state emblem courtesy: wikipedia

Iran’s very own 'Roman' coins: The Last Shah’s stamp on posterity

History has a very unkind habit of repeating itself and often in settings vastly different than the original one albeit in the same fashion. A particular Iranian coin from my collection amazed me at its similarity to archetypal Roman coins with the bust of the Roman Emperor surrounded by Roman legends found scattered all over the world known to Romans; except the script was Persian (with a Persian Pa in the upper line clinching it in favour of Persian as it’s absent in Arabic script and language) and its reverse showed the image of an imposing Lion brandishing a sword standing in front of resplendent Sun!
Intrigued by the initial findings, I relied on my magnifying glass to tell the rest of the story. The coin’s obverse had the side profile of an Iranian ruler as well etched as a Roman Emperor’s with the legend in the upper line reading:
‘Muhammad Reza Shah Pahlavi Arya Mihr Shahanshah-i-Iran’

The regnal titles translate as ‘The Light of the Aryans the King-of-Kings (a very old Persian title from its Sassanid era)
The lower line gave the date ‘2536’ which does not translate into any meaningful Islamic date; however crosschecking with my Persian teacher, an Iranian expatriate, I discovered that Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi (r. A.D. 1941-1979) initiated a new Imperial Calendar in 1976, using the birth of ancient Persian Emperor Cyrus as the first day, replacing the Hijri era of Prophet Muhammad. Hence as far as coinage is concerned, the numeral year leaped by almost a millennium from 1355 A.H. to 2535. Thus, the date ‘2536’ on my coin signaled that it was dated in the Imperial Era of Iran and its date in Christian era was 1977.

The reverse of Muhammad Reza Shah’s coins show the image of an Asiatic Lion holding a sword with the Sun in the background. The amazing part of this regnal symbol is that it was also employed in medieval India by Mughal Emperor Nur-ud-din Jahangir (r.1605-1627) (You can check the image on British Museum’s website at the following link http://www.britishmuseum.org/explore/highlights/highlight_image.aspx?image=k102920.jpg&retpage=17384
The Lion with the Sun represents two unmistakable symbols of power and the Sun (Mihr/Miiro or Khursheed) has been a revered natural deity of the Persian people thus lending the Shah of Iran a distinct temporal power over his people. We are all aware of the Lion’s share from Aesop’s Fables which is why kingship is often represented by a Lion.
The coin shows the Shah’s crown placed above these two powerful symbols implying the Shah’s omnipotent power over his people; the Shah’s assumption of such supreme power brought him into direct conflict with the Islamic clergy of Iran which bid their time till the final ushering in of an Islamic revolution in 1979.
The coin’s denomination is '20 Riyal' is generally a written denomination since a more popular unit of account called 'Toman' (equal to 10 Riyal) is more preferred in day-to-day transactions in Iran. In this context, a letter from John Horne, the Governor of Bombay to Nadir Shah* in 1738 at the Maharashtra State Archives speaks of British losses to the tune of 12000 Tomans due to extortion by Nadir Shah's officials in Teheran. The modern Riyal is said to contain 100 Dinars as sub-units but the low value of Riyal itself conceals this sub-unit.
According to Iranian expatriates, although the value of goods in a market are officially expressed in Riyals, the vocal transaction is always in Tomans!
This single coin from pre-Islamic Revolution Iran tells us the story of a bygone era in the history of an ancient nation which is increasingly wiping off all traces of its rich past in the garb of misguided Puritanism.

* The Persian invader who devastated Delhi under Mughal Emperor Muhammad Shah 'Rangeela' in 1739 and extracted the Kohinoor and Shahjahan's Peacock Throne along with 14 crore rupees as booty!

A Tunisian Dinar Coin with the image of a beautiful farmer maid to promote the country's progressive image

Coins have always served a more important purpose for ruling elite the world over. A coin is the best propaganda tool since time immemorial. Another fanciful coin in my coin collection which set my imagination soaring was a silverish looking coin with the image of a beautiful farmer lady with Arabic inscriptions in my collection.

I was sure it was the coin of an Arabic country poised to break free from its medieval past and adopt a modernist agenda.

Reading the obverse legend (see below) gives the ruler's name in the upper line as 'al-Habib al Burqiba' with the lower line stating 'Rais al-Jamhooriyat al Tunisiyya' meaning 'President of the Republic of Tunisia' making it obvious that the coin hails from modern Tunisia, a tiny country in the northern most part of Africa. The ruler mentioned was Habib al Burgiba, a person who presided over the country's future right since its independence from France in the 1940s till he was forced to abdicate in favour of his Prime Minister.

The coin further shows a semi-modern approach by use of modern dating -'1976' instead of the Islamic calendar in Hijri era. The woman is shown harvesting crops in her field with a modern tractor in the background completing the image of a progressive nation breaking free from its past shackles.

It shows it takes a woman to make vital changes in the economy of both her home and her nation; driving home a modern message now acknowledged world over.

The legend above the lady states 'al-Bank al-Markazi al-Tunisiyya' meaning 'Central Bank of Tunisia' and the lower line shows its denomination as 'Dinar Wahid' meaning 'One Dinar' with the Roman numeral '1' in the centre.

Tunisia is a relatively peaceful country despite its authoritarian regime; its populace is like modern Turkey free from radical agenda which makes it acceptable to the West which supports its economy by importing Tunisian goods in a good measure. Modern Tunisia claims to be one of the most surging economies in the African sub-continent. Thus, a country's coins are valuable indicators of the 'state of mind' of its rulers, their aims and goals that they wish to project to both domestic and international audiences.

An assassinated Saudi King’s numismatic legacy retraced from a small denomination coin

Delving further into my pot of old collected coins; I came across another unique Islamic coin which I did not know from a scratch. However, I could however soon make out the King’s name written in Arabic on the obverse side above the heraldic symbol of the kingdom; aided by a date in presumably the Hijri era on the reverse to help me ascribe it to a specific country. The name inscribed on the coin is ‘Faisal-bin-Abd’ Al- Aziz Al Saud’ (left image) in the upper line in a continuous Arabic legend from right to left (see image) hinted that it was a coin from Saudi Arabia. The lower line read as ‘Mallik Al Mulk Al Arabia Al Saudia’ roughly translated as ‘King of the country of Saudi Arabia’ confirmed my initial impression.

Searching the internet for information, I discovered that King Faisal bin Abdul Aziz was born in 1904 in Riyadh and was the third son of the founder of the modern kingdom of Saudi Arabia, King Abdul Aziz ibn Saud, popularly known by his patronymic name Ibn Saud.
Although Faisal ruled Saudi Arabia from 1964 to 1975, he was initially installed as the Crown Prince and later was the Prime Minister of Saudi Arabia on two occasions under the kingship of his elder brother, Saud bin Abdul Aziz since 1953. However, after a prolonged struggle with Saud, he took over the reins of the kingdom in 1964 to pursue a semi-modernist path till his death on March 25 1975 at the hands of his half-brother's son, Faisal bin Musa'id in a public gathering. Faisal was succeeded by his half-brother, Khalid.
As a part of his pan-Islamic ideology which largely guided his foreign policy, Faisal developed a close alliance with Sunni Pakistan. He was very close to Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, the then Prime Minister of Pakistan. Many places in Pakistan were posthumously named in Faisal’s honour; Lyallpur city in Punjab Province was renamed as Faisalabad in 1979; the Faisal Mosque in Islamabad is also named after him; the main highway in Karachi was renamed ‘Shahrah-e-Faisal’ ‘The Royal Road of Faisal’, etc.
In fact, this coin owes its existence to this Saudi-Pakistani collaboration as it is said to have been minted at the Lahore Mint in Pakistan for the Saudi Government in large numbers in a singular date of 1392 A.H.

The reverse legend (right image) tells another tale which required some ingenious net searching on my part. The date on the reverse is 1392 A.H. which translates into 1972 A.D. The other legend in the circle at the centre reads as ‘Qirsh A’nain’ However, in my net searches I found that in Saudi Arabia this unit, Qirsh is pronounced as ‘Ghirsh’ in Saudi Arabia despite the use of the letter ‘Qaaf’; searching the names of Arabic numerals, I discovered Ath- nain is Arabic for ‘Two’ and hence the denomination was ‘Two Ghirsh’. The English and Arabic numerals flanking the circle suggest another denomination of ‘10’ which was intriguing. The Arabic word for ‘Ten’ is ‘Ash-Ra’ which is inscribed on the first part of the upper legend and the next word is ‘Halalat’ which I assumed is the name of the unit.

I searched the internet especially Wikipedia and found the following information about the Saudi Arabian currency system.
The Official currency of Saudi Arabia is the Saudi Riyal which is officially divided into two subunits 20 Ghirsh and 100 Halalas; making 1 Ghirsh equal to 5 Halalas. The Halala system was introduced only in 1963 (probably when Faisal was the Prime Minister for the second time) prior to which the Ghirsh was the only sub-division.
In 1972 under Faisal, cupro-nickel coins of 5, 10, 25 and 50 Halalas were introduced. Since then, the use of the term Ghirsh has slowly been abandoned as the Halala system of sub-division is more popular.

Thus, King Faisal was a pioneer in the field of Saudi currency as his leadership gave birth to a new numismatic sub-division which slowly replaced the old system in the next few decades.
Once again, a single coin opened a cornucopia of information for me based upon its Islamic method of systematic information dissemination through right deduction.

A Tale of two Omani Coins

Recently I started examining my old collection of coins which I had collected as a schoolboy. This collection had many hastily collected coins from Islamic countries of the Middle East which I had acquired through my uncles who stayed in UAE for a while in the late seventies. In the collection I came across two similar looking coins with a common central emblem. Reading the script of the two coins I discovered the image on left had the legend 'Said-bin Taimur' (Upper line right to left) 'Sultan Muscat wa Oman' (lower line right to left); whereas the right coin had the legend 'Qaboos-bin-Said' (upper line right to left) 'Sultan Oman'.

I was highly excited as the two coins suggested a father-son relationship but one was said to rule 'Muscat & Oman' whereas the other only 'Oman'. I examined the reverse of the coins for further clues. A study of the images of the reverse sides as listed above showed the following important facts; the coin of Sultan Said-bin-Taimur was dated 1390 A.H. (After Hijri era which commenced around 622 A.D.) which translates into 1970 A.D. of the Christian calendar and Sultan Qaboos-bin-Said's coin is dated 1395 A.H. which mean 1975 A.D.

A careful study of Oman's history on Wikipedia revealed the following important facts which came out of studying the two coins; Sultan Said-bin-Taimur ruled the Sultanate of Muscat & Oman with dictatorial control over its oil-rich resources from 10 February 1932 till his overthrow in 1970 by his only son, Qaboos.

Qaboos was a trained soldier in the British Army who returned to Oman and was resisted by Said who placed him under a virtual house arrest. Qaboos overthrew Said in a palace coup in late 1970. He renamed the Sultanate as 'Sultanate of Oman' with Muscat as its capital and reformed Oman currency with Riyal Omani replacing its previous form Riyal Saidi.

This brings us to the next important information about these coins; both are valued at 10 Baisas; however in Said-bin Taimur's time the Riyal Saidi was sub-divided into 100 Baisas whereas Qaboos-bin Said sub-divided the Riyal Omani into 1000 Baisa.

Baisa is an Arabic corruption of Indian word Paisa; Arabic languages do not have the alphabet 'Pa' hence it is substituted with 'Ba'.

Before 1940, the Indian Paisa was the dominant currency prevalent in coastal regions of Muscat & Oman; hence when Omani currency was introduced, the Baisa system was conveniently used. Thus, two tiny coins in my long forgotten collection opened a chapter in history for me in the most memorable fashion. Indeed more such gems will be dug out and dwelt upon in my future posts.